<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Website Optimization [Book Review]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.svennerberg.com/2008/12/website-optimization-book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.svennerberg.com/2008/12/website-optimization-book-review/</link>
	<description>A blog about web developement and usability.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Svennerberg</title>
		<link>http://www.svennerberg.com/2008/12/website-optimization-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Svennerberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svennerberg.com/?p=874#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Andy:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; You&#039;re absolutely right! I&#039;m definitely in the developer category. I also think you&#039;re right about that it&#039;s important to have real-world data to prove what works or whats not. I&#039;m sure that if I would be into the whole SEO business, I would find it to be invaluable information.

Overall I must say that I&#039;m impressed by the amount of real tests performed throughout your book. It really gives substance to the points you&#039;re making. 

Cool post about my review! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Andy:</em></strong> You&#8217;re absolutely right! I&#8217;m definitely in the developer category. I also think you&#8217;re right about that it&#8217;s important to have real-world data to prove what works or whats not. I&#8217;m sure that if I would be into the whole SEO business, I would find it to be invaluable information.</p>
<p>Overall I must say that I&#8217;m impressed by the amount of real tests performed throughout your book. It really gives substance to the points you&#8217;re making. </p>
<p>Cool post about my review! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy King</title>
		<link>http://www.svennerberg.com/2008/12/website-optimization-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svennerberg.com/?p=874#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>Gabriel,

Thanks for your review of my book. I&#039;m glad that you enjoyed the performance section of the book, people tend to lean towards the SEM or performance section of the book, based on their orientation (marketer vs. developer). I would disagree with you on the references and statistics. Although I certainly included a lot of them (we actually cut them down substantially in the editing process), I think that for SEO especially there is a distinct lack of research-based findings and a lot of conventional wisdom. I wanted to only include things that were proven to be true (at least true at the time of printing) by empirical tests or our experience with actual clients. 

I&#039;ve blogged your review to that effect at:

http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/2008/12/website-optimization-secrets/

thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabriel,</p>
<p>Thanks for your review of my book. I&#8217;m glad that you enjoyed the performance section of the book, people tend to lean towards the SEM or performance section of the book, based on their orientation (marketer vs. developer). I would disagree with you on the references and statistics. Although I certainly included a lot of them (we actually cut them down substantially in the editing process), I think that for SEO especially there is a distinct lack of research-based findings and a lot of conventional wisdom. I wanted to only include things that were proven to be true (at least true at the time of printing) by empirical tests or our experience with actual clients. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve blogged your review to that effect at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/2008/12/website-optimization-secrets/" rel="nofollow">http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/2008/12/website-optimization-secrets/</a></p>
<p>thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: user interface design &#124; AMD.com hot tags</title>
		<link>http://www.svennerberg.com/2008/12/website-optimization-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>user interface design &#124; AMD.com hot tags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svennerberg.com/?p=874#comment-882</guid>
		<description>[...] Vote  Website Optimization [Book Review] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vote  Website Optimization [Book Review] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
